Comparative Analysis of Networks of Collaboration of Canadian Researchers in the Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and the Humanities
Larivière, V., Y. Gingras et É. Archambault, Comparative Analysis of Networks of Collaboration of Canadian Researchers in the Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and the Humanities, in Ingwersen, P. and B. Larsen (eds), Comptes rendus de la 10ième conférence internationale de la International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, 2005, pp. 565-574.
This content is not available in the selected language.
A basic dichotomy is generally made between publication practices in the natural sciences and engineering (NSE) on the one hand and social sciences and humanities (SSH) on the other. However, while researchers in the NSE share some common practices with researchers in SSH, the spectrum of practices is broader in the latter. Drawing on data from the CD-ROM versions of the Science Citation Index, SocialSciences Citation Index and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index from 1980 to 2002, this paper compares collaboration patterns in the SSH to those in the NSE. We show that, contrary to a widely held belief, researchers in the social sciences and the humanities do not form a homogeneous category. In fact, collaborative activities of researchers in the social sciences are more comparable to those of researchers in the NSE than in the humanities. Also, we see that language and geographical proximity influences the choice of collaborators in the SSH, but also in the NSE.
This content has been updated on June 2nd, 2017 at 13 h 06 min.